I got a little heated today while reading Alix’s blog. I got a little heated when someone said that gay people not only have no right to marry, because marriage is between a man and a woman and it is “sacred”, I got very heated when it was said that “why would gay people get married in a place (the church) that doesn’t want them”. So, I thought to myself that trying to prove me wrong, doesn’t make you right.
I have never been more certain that the institution of marriage that is recognized by the law should have nothing to do with the religous aspect of marriage. Meaning, we commonly say that people are married once they complete the ceremony (usually complete with a preacher or official) followed by some cake (I had to put that in there). BUT the legal aspect of marriage is simply papers and documentation the couple signs and provides to the state. There are couples who are legally married and never have a ceremony or have one at a later date. By law, they are still married. As such, this marriage (a legal marriage) complete with all the rights that the law gives married couples should not be withheld from same-gender loving persons. You can take your civil unions and domestic partnerships and shove it because it’s not the same. It’s separate and not equal. Or, let’s call all legal marriages civil unions which more closely pegs it as a legal agreement not a religious one.
Let me break my thought process down because this is the problem I have with people who are against gay marriage. Their thought process is limited because it can be. They don’t think through things or apply logic or just a dose of humanity to their argument. See, when you are the privilege and everything was created and run by people like you then society is catered to your needs, wants and desires. See, a white person wasn’t going to be the Champion of desegregating schools because they weren’t victims of “separate yet equal”, when your children got a cramped school, with inadequate resources and substandard education then the trigger goes off. Something isn’t quite right…this is what I have to deal with because of the color of my skin? Separate is not equal. A man doesn’t understand what it’s like to be a woman climbing the corporate ladder, since they have never experienced being made to feel stupid, sexual harassment, being more qualified yet passed over on promotion in favor of a less qualified male, not being allowed in the ole boys network, etc… Because from where they sit, there is not problem and easy to say that it’s not a problem when you don’t face the problem. These types of people who lack depth and perception want to cling to “tradition” and notions of “separate but equal” to keep others down in order to stay up. Their own insecurities and fear is masked by anger and hatred. It is masked by using the Bible or other “proof” that they way it is is the way it should be. And so those with power promote fear and hatred, they spread it like the truth and make rather compelling arguments for it until it reaches critical mass, and we get:
- The justification that is was OK to kidnap millions of Africans from their homes, enslave them and refuse to even call them a human being because of the color of their skin. The gall to teach that God promote slavery and indecent treatment of His people. Decades of emotional and physical abuse, segregation, lynchings, unjust treatment, unequal legal protection, etc… followed. People march fought and died for the rights of blacks, just the right for blacks to be, to be who they are without legal or societal persecution. And we still fight, to this day, even with the first black man as President, we still fight. You can goto any website today and see all the stupid things people have said about Barack Obama and black people, how we are this and we are that. They want us to believe that somehow because of the color of our skin, we are less than. Trying to prove me wrong doesn’t make you right.
- The killings of hundreds of thousands of Jews, because, well, they were Jews. Somehow, they weren’t the “right” people, they weren’t the chosen ones, therefore some nutcase thought that they should die. This nutcase infected others with this thought processes and they carried out horrible crimes against humanity. Any time I think about this, even thought it was way before my time I feel heavy and troubled in my spirit. Men, women and children died horrible deaths because they were Jewish, because someone had decided that that was wrong. Trying to prove me wrong doesn’t make you right.
- The atrocies in Rwanda were committed against a rival group by another. What was their crime? After all, they were all the same people? They simply had a different name, that was their crime. A name given to them by Europeans which meant nothing, it didn’t change who they were, it didn’t make them evil, it didn’t even matter. But people were able to incite such hatred to the point that others were murdered, because of their name. That’s like taking a family and calling half of them A and the other half B and then for some reason A and B hate each other and B slays A. WHY?? WHY?? I don’t know, but the capacity of humans to be horrible and to rationalize their hatred to the point where lies are the truth is scary. Trying to prove me wrong, doesn’t make you right.
These are extreme examples, these are the worst examples of human reign and judgment but my point is that we have a tendency fear and incite hatred until the irrational becomes rational.
If you don’t have a reason to challenge the status quo then why should you? Folks who say that the Bible is against homosexuality have no problem ignorning other parts of the Bible. They have no problem accepting the divorced person or any of the other things the Bible speaks against but they continue to harp on this condemnation of gays. Funny though, most of these people have their own plank in their eye they should address. But nooooooooooo…they won’t do that. They want to throw the Bible at people and somehow want to believe that one person loving another is a sin against God. But yet, when you point out how do you adhere to one passage and ignore 10 others, they ignore that too.
I believe that getting the “religious folk” to accept gay marriage is a long and hard fight. Quite frankly, it’s not worth it. Most have rationalized the irrational, emotion has replaced logic and the need to be right has replaced the right for gays and lesbians to enjoy the rights guaranteed to us by the constitution. If a preacher doesn’t want to marry me and my gf, then he/she doesn’t have to. Furthermore, as I’ve said in other blogs marriage is in the heart and in the mind. I don’t need a ceremony or even a piece of paper the true essence of marriage doesn’t need approval by anyone on this earth. Many straight people are so caught up in the pomp and circumstance of the wedding, they don’t focus on the actual married part. Hence, why 50% of marriages end. And yes, religious people are more likely to get divorced than non-religous people. With this alarming divorce rate, I don’t see religious folks seeking to ban divorce or do much about it. On the contrary, I hear people from the pulpit talking about their 1st or 2nd wife they divorced. I guess people do change the Bible to suit them when they feel like it. Who knew?
Trying to prove me wrong doesn’t make you more holy, or right or better than me. I wish people would stop projecting their fears and insecurities onto others. But it’s sooo much easier to point out what is “wrong” with other people, than to check yourself. Because that’s what it boils down too. Much of the anti-gay marraige argument is clouded in stuff that has nothing to do with gay people at all, its people projecting their “stuff”. Why should someone else car so strongly about who I marry? Are these people going to give me help when I need it, if I was suffering would they come to my aid of course not? But who I marry is of utmost concern?! I can marry a man who I despise, just want his money and I am hoping he will die soon so I can walk away with a nice insurance check and folks will give me their blessings? But I can’t marry a woman whom I love, cherish, respect and adore because that would ruin the “sanctity of marriage”?
I found this online, and It’s like this person is walking around in my head. This sums up well what I have been saying for the longest:
“If marriage was simply a legal document that showed two people were in love, then I really wouldn’t care. But it’s not. Marriage brings certain rights to a partner that otherwise aren’t available, such as health insurance, inheritance, and tax benefits. It’s not simply man-woman love made legal. It’s a two-partner partnership. If a man and a woman can get married without being in love, and do it only for the legal benefits of it, how does two gay men or women getting married out of actual love ruin the sanctity of marriage.
Why haven’t I heard about Hollywood marriages in a State of the Union address? Celebrities getting married and divorced every three months doesn’t ruin the sanctity of marriage?
The sanctity of marriage is a myth. It is nothing but a way for the religious powers to try to keep homosexuals from having any type of equality. That’s all it is. If it were actually about marriage, then you’d hear at least some complaints about the scam marriages that happen everyday between men and women who don’t love each other.” Source
Amen to that!
Update: My gf read this and told me I needed to spell check…so I did. Then she said “but is good though”. By the look on my face, she then said “you know maybe someone wants to republish it…” Nice save. I never claimed to be the best speller!












